JAMS Neutral · Los Angeles · New York · Virtual nationwide

Daniel B. Garrie

A mediator, arbitrator, and special master selected by counsel and appointed by courts in complex disputes throughout the United States — an experienced jurist with a deep understanding of law, technology, and finance.

Daniel B. Garrie
Photograph Courtesy of Law & Forensics LLC.
200+
Arbitrations & mediations conducted
Harvard
Adjunct in cyber, crypto & forensics
4
U.S. patents in cyber forensics
N.D. Cal.
Special Master, In re Facebook Consumer Privacy

For counsel evaluating fit

What kind of dispute do you have?

Open any area to see how Daniel approaches it and what he has decided. Pick the one closest to your matter — or scan to confirm fit and move on.

  1. Cybersecurity & data breach Breach apportionment, MSSP/vendor liability, ransomware-recovery accountability, post-incident coverage, and regulatory exposure under HIPAA, GLBA, NYDFS 500, and state regimes.

    Disputes that turn on control-failure analyses, the chain of custody of breach evidence, and how to apportion blame across victims, vendors, and insurers. The hearing is often about whether a forensic image was preserved properly — and whether the data is what it purports to be.

    Co-inventor on four U.S. patents in cybersecurity forensic technology. Founder of Law & Forensics LLC. Teaches Cybersecurity Law at Harvard.

  2. Artificial intelligence & algorithmic disputes Training-data provenance and scope, foundation-model licensing, generative-output infringement, algorithmic discrimination, automated-decision transparency, deepfake authentication.

    These cases turn on what went into the model, what came out of it, and whether anyone can prove either. Daniel's appointments have included foundation-model licensing arbitrations and neutral-expert assignments for algorithmic-bias inquiries.

    Advisor to Reality Defender (deepfake detection). Teaches Computer Forensics at Harvard, with an emphasis on authenticating AI-generated evidence.

  3. Cryptocurrency, smart contracts & digital assets Token issuance disputes, DeFi protocol failures, exchange insolvencies, custodial losses, smart-contract performance, and the contractual perimeter of on-chain agreements.

    Disputes where the parties cannot agree on what the chain shows, what the contract was supposed to do, or who is responsible when it does something else. Resolved by a neutral who reads the trace.

    Teaches Cryptocurrency & Smart Contracts at Harvard. Certified Blockchain Engineer (IIB Council). Advisor to AnChain.ai.

  4. Privacy & data protection GDPR/CCPA/CPRA enforcement, BIPA class disputes, cross-border transfer breakdowns, consent and dark-pattern claims, and supervised remediation of data-governance programs.

    Privacy matters increasingly hinge on technical questions about how data was collected, where it lives, and what consent looked like at the moment of collection — questions a generalist neutral often defers, and a technical neutral can decide.

    Court-appointed Special Master in In re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation (N.D. Cal.).

  5. Fintech, payments & banking BaaS partner failures, neobank–sponsor bank breakups, card-network and payment-rail disputes, AML/KYC enforcement spillover, e-banking outages, and the indemnity wars that follow.

    Fintech disputes typically combine financial-services regulation, contractual indemnity, and platform-engineering questions — and a generalist neutral usually has to send one of them out to an expert.

    Former Senior Team Lead, e-Banking at Westpac. Advisor to multiple fintech ventures.

  6. Partnership, shareholder & closely-held disputes Founder removal, deadlock, valuation, derivative claims, oppression of minority members, and the technical post-mortems that follow a CTO-co-founder departure.

    A neutral who has built and run technology partnerships from inside the cap table — useful when the dispute is as much about who built what as it is about who owns what.

  7. Venture capital & growth-stage investment disputes Founder–investor disputes, milestone-failure claims, anti-dilution and pay-to-play fights, secondary-sale conflicts, and post-acquisition R&W claims when a tech deal goes sideways.

    Resolution that holds up requires understanding both the deal paper and the underlying technology. Former partner at Pulse Advisory Venture Development Group; ongoing advisor to emerging-tech companies including AnChain.ai, Eccentex, and Clipr.ai.

  8. Employment & trade-secret disputes Non-compete enforcement, executive-departure forensics, source-code exfiltration, internal-investigation disputes, EEOC mediations, and supervised ESI preservation.

    Whether either side can prove its case often depends on whether evidence was preserved properly in the first ten days. Daniel has been appointed as eDiscovery Special Master in employment class actions.

  9. Intellectual property & trade secrets Source-code review protocols, software valuation, IP licensing breakdowns, and multi-hundred-million-dollar trade-secret and patent disputes in the technology sector.

    Cases that turn on whether the code is the code, what it does, and what it is worth — with a neutral whose own four patents give him a working understanding of the prosecution record.

  10. E-discovery & digital forensics Special-master orders on preservation, ESI protocols, custodial identification, privilege logs, predictive coding and TAR validation, and authentication of ephemeral and chat-based evidence.

    The discipline Daniel has written the standing treatise on, and where his patented forensic capability does the most work.

    Co-author, Dispute Resolution and E-Discovery (Thomson Reuters). Member, Sedona Conference WG1 and WG6.

If you already know your area

What role do you need, and how does a matter run?

Daniel is appointed in seven distinct neutral capacities. Every engagement, regardless of role, follows the same written-record spine with the same timing commitments.

Roles Daniel serves in

  • Arbitrator — Sole or chair under JAMS, AAA, ICC, HKIAC, LCIA, and CPR rules. Most engagements as sole arbitrator.
  • Mediator — Pre- and post-filing, including cross-border. Confidential settlement work.
  • Special Master — Rule 53 and state-court engagements. Court-appointed in In re Facebook (N.D. Cal.) and W.D. Pa.
  • Discovery Referee — ESI protocols, TAR validation, privilege logs, platform-scale production.
  • Neutral Evaluator — Early neutral evaluation of technically complex disputes before formal litigation paths.
  • Hearing Officer — Banking, insurance, and professional-licensure proceedings.
  • Temporary Judge · Pro Tem — California and other jurisdictions permitting pro tem service in civil matters.

How a matter moves

  1. Within 24 hours Conflicts check. Returned in writing with availability and proposed scope. No engagement is formed.
  2. Within a week Confidential scoping call. Thirty to sixty minutes with counsel — no obligation, no fee.
  3. Weeks one to two Engagement & scheduling order. Written retention, preliminary conference, and a schedule that reflects the complexity of the matter.
  4. As scheduled Hearing. Los Angeles, New York, or virtual. Streamlined where the parties want efficiency; full record where they do not.
  5. Within 30 days of submission Reasoned award or report. Substantive findings on the record, except where the record itself requires more.

Expedited arbitrations, emergency relief, and interim orders are routinely accommodated where the matter warrants compression.

Evidence, not adjectives

Selected matters

One court appointment, a docket of representative engagements, and what counsel and judges who have worked with Daniel have said.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal. · Hon. Vince Chhabria · Special Master

In re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation

Daniel was appointed by the court to resolve the technical questions of producing data from one of the world's largest data processors. He issued dozens of orders shaping discovery, preservation, and the authentication of platform-scale evidence in a class action representing hundreds of millions of users — setting durable benchmarks for how privacy class actions are litigated across the technology sector.

Class size
Hundreds of millions
Production scope
Platform-scale ESI
Orders issued
Dozens, on the record

Other representative engagements (identifying details withheld)

Representative neutral engagements
Year Forum Matter Role
2025 AAA Foundation-model licensing dispute concerning training-data scope and downstream output indemnification. Arbitrator (Chair)
2025 JAMS DeFi protocol failure: claims by token-holders against a development DAO and its core contributors over a smart-contract exploit. Sole Arbitrator
2024 HKIAC Cross-border trade-secret and source-code exfiltration dispute spanning U.S., mainland China, and EU custodians. Arbitrator
2024 Del. Ch. Post-acquisition cyber-diligence claim against a target whose breach was discovered four months after closing. Mediator
2024 N.D. Cal. BIPA class action against a facial-recognition vendor; supervised consent-record forensics and TAR validation. Discovery Special Master
2023 JAMS Founder–investor partnership dispute at a Series C fintech: control rights, founder removal, and milestone-failure damages. Sole Arbitrator
2023 ICC EU–US data-transfer dispute following the invalidation of a transfer mechanism mid-performance. Mediator
2023 N.D. Ill. Algorithmic-bias inquiry into a consumer-credit model; appointed neutral expert with reporting obligations. Neutral Expert
One of the few people who understand both the technical and legal issues that arise in disputes. His knowledge of each is at an expert level.
Chief Privacy Officer & Partner · Global Law Firm
His report was a model of clarity — even to a lay person — and demonstrated how extremely conscientious and thorough the investigation was.
United States District Judge · Appointing Court

Background

About Daniel

Two decades resolving disputes at the intersection of law, technology, and finance — with a forensic engineering practice and a Harvard seminar behind him.

Daniel B. Garrie is a mediator, arbitrator, and special master selected by counsel and appointed by courts in complex disputes throughout the United States. An experienced jurist with a deep understanding of law, technology, and finance, he is a JAMS Neutral, an adjunct professor at Harvard University, and the founder of Law & Forensics LLC.

He has served as sole or panel arbitrator in more than two hundred matters, and has successfully resolved disputes involving large and small cryptocurrency, blockchain, cybersecurity, AI, and privacy matters — including foundation-model licensing, DeFi protocol failures, and nine-figure trade-secret and partnership disputes. As court-appointed Special Master in In re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, he issued the decisions that shaped how one of the largest data processors in the world produced platform-scale evidence.

He teaches Cybersecurity Law, Cryptocurrency & Smart Contracts, and Computer Forensics at Harvard, and has held prior adjunct appointments at Cardozo School of Law and Rutgers School of Law. He has educated hundreds of mediators, arbitrators, and sitting judges on resolving cybersecurity and technology disputes. He is a named inventor on four U.S. patents in cybersecurity forensic technology and has authored more than four hundred articles, with scholarship cited in more than five hundred opinions and works. He is admitted to practice in New York and Washington and accepts engagements throughout the United States and internationally.

Independent recognition

Honors & recognition

Named appointments, fellowships, and press attributions — with the granting body and year on the record.

Named honors

  • Distinguished Neutral Academy of Court Appointed Masters 2015
  • Distinguished Neutral Daily Journal 2015
  • Leading forensics & eDiscovery expert New York Law Journal 2015
  • Distinguished Neutral CPR Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution Active
  • Recognized contribution Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program 2013

Fellowships & memberships

  • Fellow Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals Active
  • Fellow Ponemon Institute Active
  • Member London Court of International Arbitration Active
  • Arbitrator Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Active
  • Working Groups 1 & 6 The Sedona Conference Active
  • Legal Analyst Federal Judicial Center Since 2005

In the press & faculty

  • "Law Firms Are Pressed on Security for Data" The New York Times 2014
  • "Guarding Against a 'Cyber 9/11'" The Wall Street Journal 2015
  • Co-author & faculty American Bar Association Since 2017
  • Cited contributor Harvard National Security Journal · Corporate Counsel Active